B.C. court to rule on Robert Pickton appeal
Updated Wed. Jun. 24 2009 6:27 PM ET
The Canadian Press
VANCOUVER -- It's a subversive twist
to one of the most complex, convoluted legal proceedings in modern Canadian
history: the friends and family of some 20 alleged murder victims, most of them
siding -- for the moment, at least -- with the lawyers who represent serial
killer Robert Pickton.
gut-wrenching paradox, rooted in the former pig farmer's conviction in December
2007 on just six counts of second-degree murder, has left them with a difficult
choice: another long struggle toward justice for their loved ones versus the
gratification of seeing legal closure.
The B.C. Court of Appeal will rule Thursday on appeals from both Pickton's
defence lawyers and the Crown. Pickton's counsel is appealing his convictions,
arguing -- among other things -- that the trial judge made mistakes in his
instructions to the jury.
The Crown has launched a counter-appeal of the judge's decision to split the 26
murder charges originally laid against Pickton into two separate trials. Crown
lawyers say they won't pursue a second trial if the six original murder
convictions are allowed to stand.
For those who want a verdict in the deaths of the remaining 20 women, it all
boils down to the lesser of two evils.
"We would hate to see Pickton actually win his appeal, but we want him to --
only because that is the only way we foresee the other 20 girls getting
justice," said Lori-Ann Ellis, whose sister-in-law Cara Ellis is among the
Cara Ellis was 25 when police say she was last seen in January 1997.
Dianne Rock was nearly one decade older, 34, when the mother of five vanished in
Her sister, Lilliane Beaudoin, said it's not easy pulling for Pickton's defence
team, but she believes it's her only choice.
"This way, at least I have some kind of hope that there's going to be a second
trial and that my sister's case will be in the second trial," Beaudoin said.
"It's sad to say. Usually I would go for the Crown counsel, but not in this
Beaudoin said while having the convictions tossed out would undoubtedly be
difficult for the families of the six women involved, it may be equally
difficult for the families of the 20 women to be left in limbo.
"We need the justice that they received," she said.
Pickton was convicted in December 2007 and sentenced to life in prison with no
chance of parole for 25 years in the killings of Mona Wilson, Sereena Abotsway,
Andrea Joesbury, Georgina Papin, Brenda Wolfe, and Marnie Frey.
For Frey's stepmother, Lynn, there's no question whom she's pulling for.
"I definitely root for the 20," she said. "Even if I hadn't known those people
personally, if I hadn't met them at the trial, I would have thought the same
"It's totally unfair. They need accountability, they need justice and they need
their day in court, just like anybody else."
Frey, who's been fighting to reclaim her stepdaughter's remains from the massive
collection of evidence in the Pickton case, said while a second trial would
delay that quest, it's a sacrifice she'd be willing to make.
"It is a no-win situation," she said. "If they said we're going to have another
trial, then I'll suck it up and wait for the next trial ... the pain that
they're going through is atrocious."
Not everyone is as ready to see the case go to trial for the second time.
Sarah de Vries disappeared in April 1998, one month shy of her 29th birthday,
and is one of the 20 women on the list for a possible second trial. Her friend,
Wayne Leng, said though he's conflicted at times, he doesn't really want the
court proceedings to go that far.
"Pickton can't get any more time than he's already gotten," Leng said. "He's
going to be in jail for life."
Leng stressed that he is 100 per cent behind the families hoping for a second
trial. He simply isn't convinced that more court proceedings would provide any
greater sense of closure for the loss of his friend.
"They've got the guy," he said. "They've nailed him. . . . I don't know how I
would feel any different with him absolutely being found guilty of her murder."
For Beaudoin, however, it's important that the circumstances that led to her
sister's death be part of the public record.
"This is why I want a trial for my sister," she said.
"My sister is gone. I want the man who supposedly has done this to her to be
accountable for it. You just don't press charges of first-degree murder against
a man and then not go forward."
Pickton was arrested in February 2002, setting off a massive search of his
property in Port Coquitlam, B.C., where investigators found body parts, blood
samples, fragments of bone and the belongings of victims.
The Crown is appealing Pickton's acquittal on six first-degree murder charges,
but Crown prosecutor Gregory Fitch has said he would prefer to see the
second-degree murder convictions stand and Pickton simply remain in prison, his
legal saga over.
Fitch did express concern about the possibility of the appeal court denying
Pickton's appeal while at the same time granting that of the Crown, which could
have the unintended effect of requiring a new trial the Crown doesn't want.
Should that happen, Fitch said he would ask the court to stay the order for a
Pickton's defence lawyers told the Appeal Court that there was a lot of
confusion among jury members on the question of whether Pickton acted alone.
Lawyer Gil McKinnon said that confusion only got worse after the jury asked a
question of the trial judge six days into deliberations.
"At least one or more jurors seemed to be having difficulty on whether Robert
Pickton was the sole shooter of the three women," McKinnon said in late March,
referring to the murders of Wilson, Abotsway and Joesbury.
The women's severed heads were found on Pickton's farm. Each woman had been
Six days into jury deliberations, Justice James Williams changed his
instructions to the jury, saying he had been "not sufficiently precise" and "in
error" in three paragraphs of his original charge.